Shintaro Mochizuki vs Ramkumar Ramanathan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Feb at 10:42 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Mochizuki vs R. Ramanathan

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mochizuki 1 - 0 Ramanathan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Shintaro Mochizuki winning 2 and Ramkumar Ramanathan winning 0. The last match between Shintaro Mochizuki and Ramkumar Ramanathan was at the Bengaluru Challenger, 25-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Shintaro Mochizuki getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mochizuki | 1 |
| Ramanathan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Bengaluru Challenger(02-25-25)
S. Mochizuki vs R. Ramanathan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $967,880 | Career Prize Money | $439,635 |
| 54.64% (218-181) | Career Total W/L | 52.29% (445-406) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 21 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 40.00% (4-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
S. Mochizuki vs R. Ramanathan Match Preview:
Prepare yourselves for the tennis showdown of the season, where second serves and return stats do the tango! In the past six months, Ramanathan has been acing it by winning 51.3% of points on second serves, while Mochizuki has been chasing with 49.52%. It's like comparing a butter knife to a slightly sharper butter knife—what a quirky stat comedy show!
Speaking of returns, Ramanathan is apparently the curious cat of second serve returns, capturing 47.77% of opponent's points. Meanwhile, Mochizuki steals the spotlight (and 52.01% of second serve points) like a mysterious magician with a racket. Plot twist: when it comes to first serve returns, Ramanathan might be writing a rom-com with a 21.36% success rate, while Mochizuki serves up an action blockbuster at 36.66%!
Both players have Squid Game levels of intensity under breakpoint pressure: Ramanathan has an escape rate of 54.08%, narrowly outmaneuvering Mochizuki, who dodges 53.46% of breakpoints, showing us that Houdini magic runs through their tennis veins.
As for who wears the performance crown, in the entire past year, Ramanathan's win rate was at a modest 43.48%, but Mochizuki decided to take a larger slice of the victory pie with 52.24%. Meanwhile, both lads have a tendency to specialize on their own surfaces, with Ramanathan finding a soulmate in Hard courts at 58% success, and Mochizuki channeling his inner clay court sculptor at 60%.
When navigating the chaotic wilderness known as Challenger/ITF land, Ramanathan prefers to travel lightly, winning only 26.92% of the matches, while Mochizuki rolls into town like a tennis star, taking 55.81% of the wins. And really, it's not the size of the prize pool, it's how you play with it!
And let's chat about the quality of opponents—Ramanathan's adversaries have an average rank of 421.76. Mochizuki, however, shakes things up by taking on players hanging around rank 280.28, making every match feel like a thrilling game of musical chairs!
Now, if the match stretches out into a third set, grab some popcorn because Ramanathan wins 42% of those nail-biters, while Mochizuki confidently struts across 57% of the manger scene under pressure.
And finally, the tipping point—breakpoint conversion! Ramanathan is plotting break-ins at a 37.04% rate, while Mochizuki cracks under the mysterious moon, converting 42.97% of his opportunities. Combine all these antics, and the tennis clairvoyant predicts the crown will rest on Mochizuki's head. But in the universe of tennis, anything could happen!
Shintaro Mochizuki vs Ramkumar Ramanathan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Mochizuki vs R. Ramanathan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:48:50 | Average Match Time | 1:48:50 |
| 64% (49/77) | 1st Serve % | 58% (48/83) |
| 73% (36/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (33/48) |
| 50% (14/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (16/35) |
| 30% (3/10) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 41% (34/83) | Return Points Win % | 35% (27/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Mochizuki Recent Matches Played
R. Ramanathan Recent Matches Played

S. Mochizuki vs R. Ramanathan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.64% (218/181) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.29% (445/406) |
| 52.90% (501/446) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.68% (1014/948) |
| 50.32% (4497/4439) | Games Win/Loss | 51.03% (9674/9283) |
| 54.91% (123/101) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.65% (294/225) |
| 57.55% (61/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.82% (78/100) |
| 42.11% (16/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.75% (42/54) |
| 58.06% (18/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.45% (31/27) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.49 |
| 887 | Aces Total | 4544 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1659 | Total Double Faults | 2269 |
| 1:41:46 | Average Match Time | 1:8:16 |
| 402.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 567.84 |
| 56% (15854/28188) | 1st Serve % | 59% (26019/43850) |
| 66% (10458/15854) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (19101/26019) |
| 47% (5788/12334) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9018/17831) |
| 44% (1406/3168) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1372/3492) |
| 42% (12080/28455) | Return Points Win % | 35% (15298/43137) |
| 60.61% (20/13) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (13/26) |
| 42.86% (9/12) | Masters W/L | 35.29% (6/11) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (11/11) |
| 38.46% (15/24) | Main Tour W/L | 47.67% (41/45) |
| 56.60% (120/92) | Challenger W/L | 43.40% (161/210) |
| 60.00% (54/36) | Futures W/L | 67.41% (213/103) |
| 54% (207/380) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (432/829) |
| 45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (10/16) |
| 57% (66/115) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (137/309) |
| 55% (78/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (127/245) |
| 83% (209/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (426/365) |
| 16% (209/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (426/60) |
| 22% (190/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (425/79) |